Wait til they make you sub to their AI for your citizenship to work.

What in the fuckety anti-anti-trust megacorp win is this???

Where is the petition to sign??

It isn’t.

The intent matters - terrorism is to use terror from the act to influence decisionmaking of other people not involved in the accident directly (to send a message with your actions/war/policy/attacks/extreme-passive-aggressiveness/etc).

What St Luigi did also wasn’t terrorism, but the wealthy group that somehow identifies themselves as the same scumbags as that healthcare CEO are a bunch of entitled delicate flowers that want to stay where they are & they indeed have the power to send a terrorist message back with what’s happening to Luigi.

We have enough money to connect all rural places with transport preferable (easier & more comfortable, timely) to cars.

As well as enough money to always get picked up by ambulances in case of any emergency.

We just chose not to invest in that & instead invest in stuff that makes wealth concentration easier - and basic infrastructure costlier (like healthcare).

Lol, so you saying that my N900 now lives in my TV?? :‘’(

I miss you, my beloved N900, and I still talk about you to people.

N900 was by far my best phone.

I’ve had a lot of Symbian phones too, most memorable was the second, the 3650!

I would have your mafia people (RIAA) meet their mafia people (Nintendo) & let them fight.

/s

No, copyright infringement is a criminal offence in this case* - there won’t be any Nintendo/Sony lawyers in any part of the investigation or trial. They might have just reported a crime.

Nobody is getting sued by Nintendo (like would be the usual business in USA).

*it has it’s own jail sentence & a 15k€ fine, tho again not clear if per case or whatever bcs the law infrastructure just isn’t up to date (never was?)

(Afaik)

He uploaded an English dubbed explanation: youtube/zSEB4if2pJQ#.

He seems super unsavvy when it comes to legal/formal proceedings or authority in general (I don’t mean that as a bad thing, we are all different, just that it can def affect how things go and escalate).
For one he got the notice in mid April & just continued to review (among other things?) such consoles this whole time (which makes me think now a trial is even more likely) & didn’t prepare for anything (his channels, personal things, SD cards with all them ROMs, etc).
The panic & the whole ‘why is this happening to me’ anger makes more sense in view of this (not that is isn’t warranted, from what I’ve seen it’s def stupid anyone is doing anything about this guy in general).

But other shit-showy things happened too - they took his phone to make a copy & didn’t return it for two months (it’s unclear if they had a warrant for it or if he volunteered it - or indeed if Italian law recognises what a “personal device” is as EU has yet to compile a delegated act that will unify definitions & personal rights for such modern necessities for all members).
(If a cop takes my phone & doesn’t promptly return it still locked I’m marring their mom & make them call me daddy before the trial starts. Then submit my phone in evidence with saucy newlywed pics. I would be angy too if they took my phone, not to mention some poor data retrieval specialist getting a lifetime dose of ptsd.)

An Italian youtuber with some legal experience explains a bit more (in Italian): youtube./zSEB4if2pJQ#.

What I was thinking is that the complaint had to be specific, ie some lawyer (for a Japanese megacorp?) found an exact thing to complain about (eg in this exact second of this specific vid he admits this personal gain and shows that illegal thing, etc). Not just something vague.
They are looking at all his communication, finances, and content on his channels (but might be focusing only on one YT channel - this and the fact they mention an Anbernic device makes me think it’s a very specific complaint).
I don’t know that much about Italian law enforcement but I agree that is a bit sus they went after him at all - there might be more to the story that he either isn’t saying or thinks (in your average “law ignorance” way) irrelevant but is very relevant. Idk.

That is literally the charge/what they are investigating.

Afaik the difference will come down to if he was ever paid for a review (which would be the difference between a regular consumer buying a thing legally & showing what he bought vs him being part of the promo campaigns by the manufacturer … you know, like Google is).

And if there is no newer specific law (the old one ofc doesn’t explain shit since it’s from pre-computer era), it might come down to him receiving free consoles to review, and maybe having a bunch of SD cards full of ROMs in his apartment.
(Meaning that if they say free review merch is a form of payment, they go to trial. As I understand he didn’t/it’s not common practice to return stuff like this after review, tho some reviewers do it and some manufacturers demand it.)

Yeah, he only showed what the police gave him (they are investigating him for promoting copyright infringement).

Yeah, it’s weird bcs as I understand that copyright law from 1941 is for the actual distribution, and if he never got paid by anyone in the distribution chain (tho as understand he did get some free consoles to review), then he wasn’t part of it - just filming himself saying what can be bought on the market.

Epstein arrested for flying on planes

People will seriously argue such title would be fine.

I agree, the title is literally false, just to get more engagement.

(If it was literal than any ads about such handhelds would be in the same category, not to mention YouTube as it allows this en masse.)

And this isn’t a comment abut the arrest (megacorps are always scumbags), just how “journalism” works nowdays.

It’s just a fact that the title could have easily explained why was he arrested - and it’s a fact that was omitted on purpose so that you have to click on it to see what the actual reason was (what potentially isn’t in accordance with the law).
(You don’t get the key info of the whole story until you pay for that info by clicking on the article so they get engagement monies.)

Let’s goooo!

(And let’s support!!)

Lol, yes, posted at late American time, mentioning “feds” in EU, for a split second I thought we had a major international incident because some stupid badged individuals powertripped to Spain ‘to bust a crim’nl’.

I’m glad they didn’t, tho it would be at last something to read about.

But that’s like twice the price of a regular 5090!!

/s

… so an almost prohibited “export” to China plated gold-finned to appease the leader of the gov that brought on said restrictions. Maybe it will be a state gift.

(Jk, gold look is very popular/has its place in Asia overall compared to Europe or north America. As a limited production of an exclusive high-end card centred around an already exclusive GPU, it makes marketing sense imo.)

Human rights were made for megacorp’s robots anyway.

So “don’t talk to strangers” or “don’t give your credit card info to strangers” never really reached the audience, did it?