I wonder if Microsoft will do a stock split in the future?

A Wine-like Hackintosh is coming

You could use CC BY 4.0 as a first option or the various options offered by Creative Commons, but you could also use the FreeBSD Documentation License, GDFL, or Free Art License.

But if you want it to be in the public domain, you can use CC0 or a license equivalent to the public domain.

What license will the content of Central Hub be under?

There’s a recent user video that explains the advantages, disadvantages, and unique features of FreeBSD.

I hope it helps.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk5kJ2iWYaU

Oracle NoSQL Database is released under the CDDL or Apache license

Java being bought by JetBrains and ending up merging Java and Kotlin

The rest in the trash

FreeBSD does not have support for multiple drives, so there may be problems on government computers.

In itself, they will have several drawbacks when moving to Linux because it does not act the same as Windows or macOS.

Everything remains the same or with few changes

The writers alleged in the complaint that Microsoft used a collection of nearly 200,000 pirated books to train Megatron, an algorithm that gives text responses to user prompts.

Which Megatron are we referring to?

This

Or This

Matrix became the new Discord

Roko’s basilisk has entered the chat

It seems like we’re going back to the 90s.

When Microsoft wanted to destroy Linux, Another similar arc is coming. I wonder if there will be other Halloween docs.

If patents did not exist, many people would be surprised that their medical expenses would be cheaper.

As several have already explained their questions, I will clarify some points.

Not all countries consider AI training using copyrighted material as theft. For example, Japan has allowed AI to be trained with copyrighted material since 2019, and it’s strange because that country is known for its strict laws in that regard.

Also, saying that AI can’t or won’t harm society sells. Although I don’t deny the consequences of this technology. But it will only be effective if AI doesn’t get better, because then it could be counterproductive.

OpenAI reminds me in some ways of Netscape, except that it hasn’t gone public yet, compared to the latter, which did so only 16 months after its founding.

They’re giving OpenAI more leverage to have a strong IPO in the future.

They used ChatGPT 4o, instead of using o1 or o3.

Obviously it was going to fail.

Most of the time technology does not cause a radical change in society except in some cases.

The system eventually adapts to new technology only if that technology can be replicated by anyone, and other problems suddenly appear that the system can’t solve at the same time. It’s just another dark age for humanity, and then it recovers and moves on.

But that is already the fault of the person who gave those instructions to the AI.

“When you are in a decision that puts you in danger you accept the tool that you initially rejected.”

It seems that Japan has applied this