I don’t have an issue, it was just a question.
I don’t ever translate anything but a few words myself.
My assumption was that a dedicated tool would have done a better job, but you have good points about tone and coherence of long text (and possibly even across many promps of the translation).

Why would they use LLMs for translation over dedicated translator (apps like Google translate)? Is this common now?

This post made me switch to Voyager

Looking forward to trying that today.

The problem is that, with a good enough cheat, it can be impossible to distinguish from a very good player.
The best cheats use a secondary device emulating human input and reactions, which is practically undetectable.

Pro is still the same desktop app

SketchUp was intended for this purpose and is so incredibly easy to get started with.
Unless something has changed, it definitely is for sketching only, as it lacks a lot of advanced functionality found in other CAD programs.

No they’re not supposed to be piling it up

Yes, but we didn’t emit nearly enough co2 on that one

It’s not worth the risk. If your job is border control, would you be smuggling goods? Maybe some would, but most would not.

They’re whitehat because they don’t want to take part in illegal activities, or already have and have grown from it.

Design lead wants parting earth and flowing lava. Budget dictates static assets and baked in animations.

Regular roundabouts don’t give pedestrian or cyclist crossings priority.

* I’m talking of the UK, that’s what the article is about. People seem confused.

So you were questioning a password limit of 256 chars.
Let’s say we do not impose a limit because we’re not worried about anything. We now get hit by a botnet trying to create accounts or login in thousands at the same time.

Say we’re using Argon2id. This is obviously subjective to hw and parameters, but let’s say 8k characters take 5 seconds of (1) cpu time on your server.
Now multiply this by 1000 attempts a second, and all your hardware does is calculate hashes.

The input limit of Argon2 specifically is much, much higher than that at 2^32-1 bytes, at which point you might as well just take it offline yourself.

If hashing of 256-character passphrases, or even 2560-character passphrases

If we impose no limit, why would the attacker limit themselves to 2560 chars?

Like an individual dev can decide to make random changes to bank systems lol

Hashing takes up cpu time

These policies typically come from top management. They’d have to fire themselves.

We just need to use it in smart ways

We’re more likely to get copper from asteroids first or die trying

I’m stuck on Fusion 360. So annoying to have that one doorstop from freedom.

There’s this new ai doc you can talk to if you’re depressed

PowerToys -> Ctr alt v
And a ton of other utils