• Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        By sea is an extremely direct route, and by land isn’t an option, so yeah, the only comparison left is by air. And shipping by air is less efficient in all respects except time.

        So saying this route is especially inefficient by sea is just a confusing statement.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          By sea is an extremely direct route

          Maybe if you ship it from the very South of Argentina (maybe they do?), otherwise it’s a significant detour to go around South America whichever way you go.

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            I just looked it up, it’s a huge distance between Thailand and Argentina, about 17,000 km if you were flying. Going around the tip of South America adds an extra 1000 km, making the trip 6% longer. Meh.

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              What are you saying? It’s longer. That’s my only point. Are you saying it’s not longer… “enough”? What’s the deal here, what are we doing?

              • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                I mean, yes. It isn’t longer enough to make sea travel anything but the most efficient method to ship something.