Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square282linkfedilinkarrow-up1986arrow-down120
arrow-up1966arrow-down1external-linkAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square282linkfedilink
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 month agoand? we can understand 256 where AI can’t, that’s the point.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoThe 256 thing was written by a person. AI doesn’t have exclusive rights to being dumb, plenty of dumb people around.
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoyou’re right, the dumb of AI is completely comparable to the dumb of human, there’s no difference worth talking about, sorry i even spoke the fuck up
Neither can we…
and? we can understand 256 where AI can’t, that’s the point.
The 256 thing was written by a person. AI doesn’t have exclusive rights to being dumb, plenty of dumb people around.
you’re right, the dumb of AI is completely comparable to the dumb of human, there’s no difference worth talking about, sorry i even spoke the fuck up
No worries.