

I’m convinced that people who are fascinated by llm chatbots are those who usually aren’t better than a chatbot at whatever they do. That is to say, they can’t do shit.
I’m convinced that people who are fascinated by llm chatbots are those who usually aren’t better than a chatbot at whatever they do. That is to say, they can’t do shit.
When everyone was talking about them paying their workers fairly, I did not expect it being 60 bucks a year. It sounds like an insult to be honest.
Fair use or something
We are trying to build a better infrastructure, where pedestrians enjoy safe and pleasant walk, cyclist enjoy safe and pleasant ride, commuters do commute, etc. In order to achieve that, it’s important that the spaces are predictable. If you’re in a shared space, you expect a bicycle, if you’re in a pedestrian area you shouldn’t be on a lookout for fast things. Same goes the other way, if you’re on a bike in a shared space, you should expect pedestrians be everywhere and should always be on a lookout, but if you’re riding a designated bike road, you should be able to enjoy the ride, not crawling with pedestrian speed dodging around.
If this rule doesn’t work, the infrastructure doesn’t work. You can’t expect people using cycling infrastructure for commute if they can’t be sure infrastructure is usable, so they wouldn’t, so everyone is riding cars and we’re back to square one.
We’re trying to build the Torment Nexus from the famous novel Don’t Build The Torment Nexus, but keep failing miserably and the Torment Nexus keeps blowing up killing random bystanders. We continue to try though.
You either an llm, or don’t know how your brain works.
And you should get some experience developing something more complicated than a simple unity project.
What made you think of this idea?
Not a game, but I was involved in making a graphics heavy app. Significant amount of times we had to grapple with question " that’s a nice feature you are making, will this work on all the platforms", and significant amount of times the answer was “obviously, unquestionably no”.
The one where you aren’t frustrated by the usage of it.
Yeah, you need to be really brave to setup your system incorrectly.
You’re doing something wrong, maybe ask someone knowledgeable for help with your system. It doesn’t happen to other people.
comes down to the setup of the toolchain.
Unless you’re developing graphics-heavy application that uses platrofm-specific API for optimisation. Like a video game for example.
Can’t confirm, I’m old and a nerd and I love C++
Oh yeah, you absolutely can test it.
And then it gives you (and this is a real example, with real function names removed)
find_something > dirpath
…
rm - rf $dirpath/*
do_something_in_the_dir(dirpath)
And it will work, but on a failure of a first question, instead of failing gracefully it wipes your hard drive clean.
You can find shit like that on the regular Internet, but the difference is, it will be downvoted and some nerd will leave a snarky comment explaining why it’s stupid. When llm gives you that, you don’t have ways to distinguish a working code from a slow boiling trap
As with a lot of things in your life, you think you know something, but actually you don’t.
You. I couldn’t avoid you. That’s what I’m mildly afraid of.
Steam OS is basically Arch Linux with KDE and Steam that autoruns in their special mode. It would even be easier to setup for yourself.
What’s scary is that chatbots will make more people like you.
I’m pretty sure both Nebula and Floatplane look for their talents themselves, you can’t just decide to be there. And they look for something more sophisticated than a guy yelling n-word at children in a currently popular videogame.