But mint wouldn’t be possible without the work that the Ubuntu community puts into making a stable and polished distribution. And Ubuntu wouldn’t be possible without the Debian community who put in the effort to make the distribution the best for their usage.

https://xkcd.com/927/

It was already a pretty attractive target because of servers for everything. I’m not sure reaching 5% desktop market share will really make it more attractive for malware.

Af an attack can escape a container a lot of companies worldwide are going to need to patch a 0-day. I do not expect that to be part of my threat model for self-hosted services.

I’m not the developer, but I do also write app backends for a living so I know there is some nuance that you’re skipping over in your response. But if you have a way to do this completely anonymous on android I’d suggest offering help to the developer who made this.

Something that… links it to the device? Like, a unique ID that Apple can identify?

APNS tokens are linked to the app install and renew on a certain timeline. Already making them not exactly the same as a device identifier.

Edited for further clarification. It’s not about Google, it’s about what Android needs to receive notifications: https://www.iceblock.app/android

Apple notification identifiers are unique to an app install and regularly change though, so it’s hardly a device identifier.

And the developer needs a device ID for that. Which is their objection: https://www.iceblock.app/android

Thanks, but I’m not the developer of the app so that’s not really relevant for me.

This is IOS only owing to Android play store collecting a device identifier; the creator wanted complete anonymity

Quote from some other place people were discussing it. Unfortunately no source on it.

EDIT: https://www.iceblock.app/android

We clearly read very different stories, in mine the computers are usually more competent than a 30% success rate.

Imagine if the internet at its inception failed to connect you 70% of the time. It’s not as impressive as most other inventions.

It can complete coding tasks. But that’s not the same as replacing a developer. In the same way that cutting wood doesn’t make me a carpenter and soldering a wire doesn’t make me an electrician. I wish the AI crowd understood that.

I’m pretty sure the users risked a lot too for this one

Looks like https://docs.numerique.gouv.fr/home/ except that one is backed by two governments.

So, same as passwords then. The service can determine what they accept as a password. And if they’re being assholes about it you can decide to go elsewhere.

https://keepassxc.org/blog/2024-03-10-2.7.7-released/ says it has passkey support. I guess the author can now do exactly what they want.

Are you looking for https://docs.docker.com/build/metadata/attestations/?

With the current FAA problems, do y’all really want more things taking off?