andyburke

… and this is how IT ends up being responsible for a breach.

It is a bug, unexpected and undefined behavior - it shouldnt have been there.

You are not wrong about the outcome from a capitalist view, but otherwise you are.

Tesla, too!

… and you’re blocked.

Amazing that this person thinks spamming is going to improve anything.

Our rail systems are crumbling for a reason.

It is much better to ship by train than truck. If we put this money toward revitalizing and expanding our rail in this country it would have a way better ROI.

One worked, though. 🤷‍♂️

🤝

Leave that website.

There is no fixing it.

I am very interested in this as well.

I wonder if creating some kind of shared NixOS setup might work? (I know very little about NixOS but it seems like it should be good for this sort of thing?)

If you start down this road and set up a git repo or something, I would be interested in contributing/testing.

I also kinda like the idea of being able to slap other things into usb ports - dashcams, a usb stick with a good road trip mix, etc.

This is cool.

It’s this old link, eh?

Citation needed.

The most compelling feature I always get asked if Jellyfin has ala Plex is the discovery/NAT punch for linking people up.

That does not strike me as something that necessarily breaks backwards compatibility. It would require some centralized discovery, and I think that is probably where we run into an issue because if I were the Jellyfin devs, I wouldn’t want to have to support that, either.

You sound like me. I hope you can find a way to flip your focus: your time outside work should be way more about you than it sounds like your work life is letting it be.

Maybe you are one of the very few with a meaningful job. If not, consider trying to treat your job like the bullshit it is and use your best cycles outside work on stuff that will really make you happy.

Jellyfin is open source. You could be helping out.

Best of luck with Plex, though. I would say this is even more writing on the wall but it does not sound like that matters to you.

<coughs out a bunch of diesel emissions> “hear hear!”

My guess? Using the term “addiction.”

https://fuelarc.com/tech/can-teslas-self-driving-software-detect-bus-only-lanes-not-reliably-no/

edit: it’s trivial to find examples of these utterly failing at basic driving. This isn’t close to human performance and it is obvious.

Get the data. Get it without putting me and my family at risk.

This is the same anecdotal appeal we get over and over while AI cars drive into firetrucks and trees in ways even the most basic licensed driver would not. Then we are told these are safer because people text or become distracted. I am over this garbage. Get real numbers and find a way to do it that doesn’t put me and my family at risk.

Evidence, please.

I have literally been in thousands of driving incidences where a human has not randomly driven into a tree.

You are making a claim here: that these AI systems are safer than humans. There is at least one clear counter example to your claim in existence (which I cited - https://youtu.be/frGoalySCns if anyone wants to try to figure out what this AI was doing) and there are others including ones where they have driven into the sides of tractor trailers. I assume you will make an argument about aggregates, but the sample size we have for these AI driving systems relative to the sample size we have for humans is many orders of magnitude different. And having now seen years of these incidents continuing to pile up, I believe there needs to be much more rigorous research and testing before you can make valid claims these systems are somehow safer.

A Tesla in FSD randomly just veered off the road into a tree. There is video. It makes no sense, very difficult to work out why the AI thought that looked like a good move.

These tools this author is saying we have do not work how people claim they do.