ipsc shooter, shitposter
If it has been downloaded over 1.7 million times you need to contact Github about this, since it is an open source project that people are depending on, and discuss your github action usage with them and determine a path forward for continuing to use github actions
The repositories that contain code that is for work need to be owned by your work, not your personal account. Have your work create a github organization and transfer your repos to their org.
By creating your own format, you now have to create your entire ecosystem, or add functionality to existing systems to deal with your format. That is a huge undertaking and why media consortiums exist for stuff like JPEG, MP3, MP4, etc etc.
I don’t know the music ecosystem at all, so I don’t know what open source programs you could modify to support your format, but realistically that could easily be a year+ project.
If you’re having fun, keep going, but it’s a big challenge
Odd. I know that FreeBSD vendors or did vendor jemalloc in-tree as their malloc implementation
IIRC automatic controls important pieces of infrastructure that made a fork very difficult, and they also sabotage people who attempted to fork
Maybe?
I tend to think that they treated people shitty because they had no solution to questions that had already been answered, besides closing the question and marking it as duplicate. That the behavior of treating people like shit was a symptom, not the disease.
SO was incredible. I remember it very fondly circa 2011 thru 2013 while it was still growing and all the questions every thought of hadn’t been asked yet.
Obviously as time went on, the challenge of organizing and managing questions once a huge base of knowledge had accumulated, proved to be a much more difficult. I don’t think they ever solved that, and ended up rewarding toxic behavior.
It’s a shame.
I was going to say “Who?” until I looked at his bio, he helped start Django which I use. I need to go lay down.
This is the same as people who don’t want to pay artists for their work and just say they get paid in “exposure”
If you are using open source as a company, you should pay the maintainers money, either through hiring them or directly funding the development.
I donate money to the pieces of software I use every day, because I’m in a position as an individual to, but there are lots of companies that are free riding