Sounds like evil inception, first the nightmare of losing your child and then the nightmare of possibly losing your job and house etc. I hope they at least don’t have to go through the nightmare of prison (which they would likely have to go through alone, since there is no couples-prison). Evil evil evil
Can’t park there mate
Not that i care that much about there being an exaggeration, but “Everyone” is literally in the title of the post? Or are you referring to the push notification as ‘the op post’??
Free ride sharing (eg hitchhiking) is better than cheap ride sharing (eg blabla car) which is better then expensive ride sharing (eg a taxi) which - but all are better than there only beingprivately owned cars that are exclusively privately used.
Demand it with more authority.
You forgot the most frequently asked question:
No.
Also available on nebula (for subscribers): https://nebula.tv/videos/eumadesimple-trumps-50-tariff-bombshell-the-eu-has-3-options/
In Barcelona they converted the grids so instead of having all traffic on every street it is one for cars in direction a, one for pedestrians and cyclists and then one for cars in the other direction and again one for pedestrians and cyclists etc, they still manage to stock stores etc so it’s very possible.
People subscribed to nebula can also watch it here: https://nebula.tv/videos/notjustbikes-they-tore-down-a-highway-and-made-it-a-river/
To be fair, njb actually mentions there are new bike lanes but they are along with the car lanes. As a dutchy (= amateur bike lane expert) I consider this the right move as it slows cars and also brings more peace and quiet to the pedestrians. I totally understand why cyclists would prefer to cycle along this cute little stream, but they are part of the traffic in my eyes.
Speed-pedelecs are allowed to go 45kmh and are allowed both on bike lanes and car lanes in the Netherlands. They have a license plate as well, looks like a regular ebike.
The poorer the country (not on average) the more demand there is for low-cost transit, that demand brings down the price of public transport tremendously because less public money is spend on other (more private) forms of transit. The ‘problem’ isn’t only people loving cars it’s also people being able to afford them. In general it also isn’t the rich asking for public healthcare and education. The lack of public transport shows the power of the wealthy over the power of the masses.
Isn’t NJB’s general rule something like the more car-friendly a place is, the worse it becomes to live there. Guess pedestrian & bike friendly is always a good thing if there’s people living around there.
I don’t feel the cars brand is always mentioned, but definitely more then other products like brand of jeans a thief wore or operating system a scammer used. I’m inclined to say low-effort news outlets would be more likely to fill their article with any information as long as it ends up as a decent length article, but might be a false assumption.
Nvm, they wouldn’t propose something instead of other taxes
Sounds like they copied their plans from the Party Against Citizens (a dutch comedy satire sketch, name says it all)
Yes, like public transport
Well good news i guess, but you cannot keep the tarmac and just call it a park. Those two things are diametrical opposites. Six lane parks wtf.
Makes most sense