

Use user styles at your own risk.
He / They
Software Developer
Use user styles at your own risk.
I was using LibreChat for a while
It’s a good starting point, never the final product.
Honestly I’d be happy with a phone sporting two USB C ports, one centered and one off to the side where the headphone jack used to be, both fully functional.
Oh yeah Copilot just spirals deeper into insanity the more you use it.
It’ll sometimes spit your own code back at you and say “there, I fixed it”, and it does the same when you point it out ad vitam aeternam. I believe this is a case of hardcore over fitting the original prompt.
*hippopotamus
Thanks, I had copy-pasted it from the website :)
My interpretation was that AI companies can train on material they are licensed to use, but the courts have deemed that Anthropic pirated this material as they were not licensed to use it.
In other words, if Anthropic bought the physical or digital books, it would be fine so long as their AI couldn’t spit it out verbatim, but they didn’t even do that, i.e. the AI crawler pirated the book.
Gist:
What’s new: The Northern District of California has granted a summary judgment for Anthropic that the training use of the copyrighted books and the print-to-digital format change were both “fair use” (full order below box). However, the court also found that the pirated library copies that Anthropic collected could not be deemed as training copies, and therefore, the use of this material was not “fair”. The court also announced that it will have a trial on the pirated copies and any resulting damages, adding:
“That Anthropic later bought a copy of a book it earlier stole off the internet will not absolve it of liability for the theft but it may affect the extent of statutory damages.”
I will shart a little
“accidentally” leaving an anchor dragging across an intercontinental internet cable would do it
""
most likely
Fingers and toes
It’s a loaded term that should be replaced with a more nimble definition.
A dog whistle is the name for a loaded term that is used to tag a specific target with a large baggage of information, but in a way where only people who are part of the “in group” can understand the baggage of the word, hence “dog whistle”, only heard by dogs.
In the case of the word “degeneracy”, it’s a vague word that has been often used to attack, among other things, LGBTQ and their allies as well as non-religious people. The term is vague enough that the user can easily weasel their way out of criticism for its usage, but the target audience gets the message loud and clear: “[target] should be attacked for being [thing].”
Another example of such a word would be “woke”.
Soft brick is a software brick, hard brick is a hardware brick.
This reads like a SQL query.
The code is sent as part of a payload to the front-end for local validation
Eh I’ll stay away from Xitter.
Sunk cost fallacy
So… Proprietary Anubis?