destructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoAnon questions modern societyimagemessage-square160linkfedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down121cross-posted to: fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1imageAnon questions modern societydestructdisc@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square160linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
minus-squaremiss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·edit-27 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·7 days agoCanada too. Europe was adopting it, but their Continent is already too population dense for the ponzi scheme of car centric design to really take off. “Cars” were the “superior” invention to rail, so wide spread adoption was attempted in most places.
minus-squarepsx_crab@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·7 days agoPretty sure car centric design is everywhere.
minus-squareschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agonot to the same degree everywhere, most European cities do have plenty of infrastructure for cars, but also plenty for public transport; I live in a city where it’s possible to get everywhere without a car, which is why I don’t own one
Only in US
TIL Australia doesn’t exist.
deleted by creator
What of it?
Canada too. Europe was adopting it, but their Continent is already too population dense for the ponzi scheme of car centric design to really take off.
“Cars” were the “superior” invention to rail, so wide spread adoption was attempted in most places.
Pretty sure car centric design is everywhere.
not to the same degree everywhere, most European cities do have plenty of infrastructure for cars, but also plenty for public transport; I live in a city where it’s possible to get everywhere without a car, which is why I don’t own one
deleted by creator