Watts are very individual, I wouldn’t compare to anyone but yourself over time, if you’re looking to improve your power.

I don’t think MnDOT are complying.

I’d trade off the massive amount of bathrooms for at most 1 bathroom with shower + maybe one toilet-only bathroom. Separate the kitchen out to a small room, make the common area larger, and add a balcony. The room sizes could probably also be varied slightly - not all rooms need a double-bed. Singles/bunk beds can be used to great effect.

It’s fully possible to share bathrooms with roommates, just as possible as sharing kitchens.

The alternative would be to just make a small kitchen and split these off as single units instead, this is just poor utilization of the space.

The more you ride, the faster you get, generally speaking.

Mountain bikes are not primarily made for speed, for what it’s worth. You’ll find the fastest speed in road bikes (actually time trial bikes, but these are not made for general riding).

Oh shit, my bad. Yeah, hard agree there

Car supporters claiming that idling from reduced capacity will make the air pollution situation worse are now permanently btfo and must never open their mouths again

Additionally, the platform being owned by an outright Nazi should give even the most out of touch people pause.

How is Daniel Ek a nazi? That’s a wild take if I’ve ever heard one.

It’s not my favourite intervention to improve transit, but it does have some benefits, like reduced dwell times from faster boarding on buses.

The important thing is that it might get a candidate elected who can perform long-term improvements.

Tangentially related, but I really enjoy Hard Fork, which covers the tech industry generally.

I’d be impressed with any model that succeeds with that, but assuming one does, the complete works of Shakespeare are not copyright protected - they have fallen into the public domain since a very long time ago.

For any works still under copyright protection, it would probably be a case of a trial to determine whether a certain work is transformative enough to be considered fair use. I’d imagine that this would not clear that bar.

I don’t think anyone would consider complete verbatim recitement of the material to be anything but a copyright violation, being the exact same thing that you produce.

Fair use requires the derivative work to be transformative, and no transformation occurs when you verbatim recite something.

It’s extremely frustrating to read this comment thread because it’s obvious that so many of you didn’t actually read the article, or even half-skim the article, or even attempted to even comprehend the title of the article for more than a second.

For shame.

…no?

That’s exactly what the ruling prohibits - it’s fair use to train AI models on any copies of books that you legally acquired, but never when those books were illegally acquired, as was the case with the books that Anthropic used in their training here.

This satirical torrent client would be violating the laws just as much as one without any slow training built in.

It’s not fool-proof by any means. All I’m saying is that you should prefer the option when available.

Steering another human by voice is a very bad interface. Prefer remote control when available.

I’d be ok with roads being fully user-funded and having the additional cost be added to the things I buy instead of them being tax subsidized.

It predates ChatGPT so I doubt it. This is organic incompetence

What the hell is wrong with the author of that article? Jesus christ

Good, but why the long wait?