• zululove@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Two things. One : that is ridiculous overreach.

    Two : we shouldn’t accept a society so dangerous our kids can’t explore and have fun…

    • bignate31@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 minutes ago

      Your second point is really difficult for me as a parent with a new kid. Feels like we “know” so much more about serial killers / bad things that happen to kids that we’re terrified of letting them do anything.

      Of course in this case it would have been trivially solved by the city just adding sidewalks, but that feels like another point here.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I never thought rural Georgia would be so car-brained about it but I guess I’m not surprised

    Was it a dangerous walk? This, too, was subjective. The prosecutor, Emma Harper, certainly thought so. Later, in a phone call to Patterson’s attorney, David DeLugas, which DeLugas legally recorded and shared with CNN, the prosecutor called it “a busy highway with no sidewalk” and said, “It’s not walkable. It’s not safe … That’s not a thing that you do here. Because you’re gonna get hit by a car.”

  • canajac@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My mother sent me to the corner store for milk when I was 6. Should I call the cops now and stool her out?

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I wonder if children walking home from school are now a problem? That was like my main source of exercise.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 hours ago

      My theory is that it’s paranoia born out of how the media handles crime, and how isolating suburbia is.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    10 hours ago

    America: “We will arrest you if you let a child out unsupervised”

    Also America “kids sit in front of the screen at home all day.”

    Also also America " if somebody accidentally runs over your child with a car they will get a 6 month license suspension"

    Also also also America “We think crime is way up even though its at record lows and a leading cause of death here is automobile accidents”

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Also also also America “We think crime is way up even though its at record lows and a leading cause of death here is automobile accidents”

      Shhh don’t tell them, they need to cling to the notion that guns are the leading cause of death for kids age 0-19 even though that covid era study took place only in 5 cities known for their HUGE gang problems while less people were driving because of lockdowns. Their way they can scream about guns online for easy virtual treats, if they knew the truth they’d have to scream about cars which (outside of here) is a harder sell and they’ll get less internet treats, nobody will even call them a good boy for having the correct opinion!

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Lol, I was literally discussing this in another thread.

        The child death rate from guns has gone down since the 90s but the death rate of kids to cars has gone way way down since the 90s to the point its dropped below gun deaths. Probably due to anything from increased work from home to increased traffic safety project funding since the late 2000s. Increased biking may even play a role.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Well all violent crime in the US has been getting lower since '93, except a small uptick around 2016-2023ish (going back down now), and of course that does include children, and yes safety has helped there as well, but the specific study that I was referencing took place during covid in NYC, Philidelphia, LA, Chicago, and iirc Baltimore, and it included 18-19 yo “kids” who are legally adults, and actual kids that are sadly involved in gang activity surprisingly young but gets more violent around 13-16 (know/knew a good number of them, but never got involved myself.) It was never actually true that guns killed more kids than cars, if you take out the 18-19yos and do that same study in the same cities now without the lockdowns (which still gives guns the advantage because many of those cities actually have good public transportation thus decreasing car use in general, and those cities still have the aforementioned gang problems) you’d likely find that cars are in fact still the leading cause of death amongst actual kids.

          Tbh if the opioid epidemic couldn’t unseat cars, nothing will without statistical manipulation.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      They do. This story is just because backward ass red state. In my neighborhood there are kids playing around all the time.

        • buttnugget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Holy smokes, that was 10 years ago. I need to look up the outcome of that case. Absolutely ridiculous. No one under 18 unsupervised? We have lost our goddamn minds.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            32 minutes ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meitiv_incidents

            Tldr: Officials clarified that it’s fine and they shouldn’t have been bothered beyond police asking the kids if they were okay in response to a call.

            The police and CPS responded because someone called the cops, who are required to respond in some way and then to document the case. The reporting code for “report of unsupervised child” is intended to be “neighbors haven’t seen the parents in several days, but they noticed the kid moving around the house and were concerned”. Sometimes it’s not okay for kids to be alone.
            So the police responded because someone called, and then gave them a ride home and filled their report. CPS got the report because the only category it fit in was one they are supposed to investigate. They did their investigation because the law says if you’re under eight you must be supervised by someone at least 13, and because they were in violation they had to do their follow-ups, which are invasive because they’re geared towards actual issues and there’s no way to delicately inspect someone’s home and interview their children.
            When it happened again at the park, there was now a report on file for a CPS investigation that was still in progress, so now it’s “parents being investigated for neglect getting another report of the same behavior”, which means that now the presumption is that the parents aren’t capable of following a directive to not do the behavior that started the investigation , so instead of sending them home and then sending an officer to see what’s up they’re going to hold them until they can determine safety. Which they were, but all the people see is “they were instructed and agreed to not leave them unsupervised until we finished and we got a concerned report about them being left unsupervised”.
            Eventually officials clarified that CPS was incorrect, and that the laws wording and intent was to prevent young children from being unsupervised in vehicles and structures, not parks, sidewalks or in public. No leaving your 7 year old home alone or in the car.

            First incident is on the busybody who called the cops and the CPS people who didn’t just leave and drop it when they learned they weren’t left behind at home or in a car, and that the sidewalk and park weren’t like, a highway median and an industrial park.

            Second incident is a little more on them. Preposterous or not, they were explicitly and legally informed they needed to not do that until CPS got back to them, and they agreed to do so. It was still more of an ordeal than it should have been, but you should generally not be surprised when they respond poorly to you doing what they just told you not to do.
            You can be entirely in the right and end up in more trouble for not following instructions during the process of figuring that out.

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The really weird thing is that back before the 1990s, when it was common for kids to be free range, there was far more stranger abductions and violent crime than there is today. We just hear about everything so quickly and so much that people think they are now living in a more dangerous time. But then that was the plan since 9/11 - have Americans live in constant fear so the government could take over.

    • MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      so by that logic, less free range children, the more safe children will be? hence the police were correct to arrest this mother?

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If this is in America, I honestly don’t blame the cops. There are republicans lurking out there.

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Pathetic. My sister and I used to explore around the whole city when we were that age. We’d walk streets and roads, explore parks and trails, visit malls across town, get into mischief like sneaking into people’s backyards, exploring abandoned properties, and building forts in the woods. Some of my strongest memories are of the adventures we went on.

    You know what the worst thing that happened to us was? The occasional scrape or bruise from falls when climbing on shit. We both remembered all the phone numbers we needed to know and my sister, being a bit older than me, was very streetwise and knew the layout of the city like the back of her hand. We did our own purchasing, bought our own food, tended our own wounds, and so on.

    My sister grew up into one of the smartest and most independent people I’ve ever met.

  • billwashere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It was very early 1980s and I was maybe 10 or 11. I went on a 10 mile bike ride from my house to a friend’s house in another town. According to Google maps it was an hour bike ride. Pretty sure it took me much longer. And I’d guess my parents had no clue I did it.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Seriously, I regularly did 12 miles round-trip on my bike down roads with no sidewalk or bike lane at 12 to see my friend who lived in the bad part of town. I guess my parents would be felons by today’s standards.

      Edit: hi again! I’m not stalking you, I promise!

  • rozodru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’m in my 40s and now I realize that my Parents would have likely been arrested several times over if I were a kid today. Hell I Imagine most of us would be in the same boat.

    I mean on weekends or during the summer I was told to get out of the house, be with friends, have fun and told to be home either for dinner or by the time the street lights came on and if I wasn’t going to be home in time then to find a phone and call my parents and let them know. Hell I could be like miles/Kilometers from home at any given moment. I could be in a friends house and their parents offered me dinner.

    I was like any kid, I got up to no good. I stole candy sometimes. I once opened a Captain Planet action figure in a store cause I wanted the power ring that was inside. I got in trouble at school cause one time during recess me and my friends just decided to start cussing at the top of our lungs.

    I’d hate to be a kid today. hell, I’d hate to be a parent today.

    • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      When I was in primary school in the early 90s we used to get offered a lift by the local milkman who often used to be on the way past when we were walking home.

      There’d be at least 4 of us. We’d throw our school bags in to the gap between his insulated box on the tray (full of milk) and the head board of the cab, then jump up and hold on the headboard so our legs would hold the bags in place. Off we’d go down the main road - heads sticking over the cab, wind in our hair - hitting 60kph with nothing between us and falling out but the fact we were holding on to the headboard.

      I see front page news blasting parents for their kid sticking their head out a sunroof in a carpark and I’m like… man, our folks would have been arrested back in the day.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I mean on weekends or during the summer I was told to get out of the house, be with friends, have fun and told to be home either for dinner or by the time the street lights came on and if I wasn’t going to be home in time then to find a phone and call my parents and let them know. Hell I could be like miles/Kilometers from home at any given moment. I could be in a friends house and their parents offered me dinner.

      Sounds like what most kids were doing from 300BC up to 1980AD

      • ansiz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Why did you stop at 1980? It wasn’t until cellphones became so common with kids that things changed. Even the in early 2000s pagers were still more common with kids/teenagers in my experience.

        • rozodru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I didn’t get my first cell phone until I was in college in like 2002 or 3. Miss that flip phone. In high school no one had a phone and maybe a hand full of kids had pagers.